We get multiple people a day trying to leave butt-hurt, violent and aggressive comments on this page. Do not waste your time with anything vulgar like this as it will be immediately rejected. While we do not condone the disgusting behaviour that often comes along with cheating i. Check out our in house program, The Orgasm Academy and The App Nights by Laura corn for becoming a great lover and keeping your long term sex life hot.
I look around and about at people talking about same-sex marriage, and it seems that everyone is accepting the discussion on the marriage bigots' terms, rather than reality.
Come on people, let's get a grip: Same-sex marriage already exists in the United States. It has for two years. The definition of marriage in the US already includes members of the same sex marrying each other.
By pressing for a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between men and women, it is the marriage bigots who are looking to change the definition of marriage. The language of the proposed constitutional amendment would end thousands of legal marriages -- both the same marriages that legally exist now and all the same-sex marriages that would occur between now and whenever the theoretical moment would be that the 37th state ratified the amendment.
The proposed constitutional amendment would make second-class citizens of all same-sex married couples by stripping them of a marital status they currently enjoy, while allowing all other legally married couples to continue being married.
Why aren't people hammering the marriage bigots with this? There's a manifest difference in a debate which has as its founding proposition that same-sex marriage is a theoretical construct in the US -- which is the proposition marriage bigots want to promote -- and the debate which has as its founding proposition that same-sex marriages are already here, and there thousands of them.
The latter forces the marriage bigots to come out and admit that their proposed amendment and their goals destroy real marriages between real people -- thousands of marriages between thousands of people.
Why aren't people asking the marriage bigots flat out what they have against marriage? And by what right are they able to say that couples who are already legally married should have their marriages declared null and void?
|Get Your English Text Proofread and Edited Instantly by Experts||Dear Wendy is a relationship advice blog. You can read about me hereperuse the archives here and read popular posts here.|
This proposed amendment breaks up marriages. God damn it, people should be hollering this at the top their lungs every time one of those marriage bigots gets all sanctimonious about what marriage means.
People ought to be getting these marriage bigots into a corner and getting them to admit that they need to destroy legal, loving marriages in order to accomplish their goals. We ought to be getting these marriage bigots admitting that they have to strip away rights these Americans already have to do what they want to do.
And then we need to ask the people "who don't know what they think about it" if they want to align themselves with people who want to destroy actual marriages in order to "preserve" a definition of marriage that doesn't actually exist.
As long as the marriage bigots can frame the debate as "defending marriage," they can avoid acknowledging their agenda is patently hateful. But the accurate frame is that they're attacking marriage -- and attacking actual marriages -- to change the definition of marriage into something that is in line with a discriminatory social agenda.
I'm not worried that this obnoxious and hateful proposed amendment will pass, mind you -- there are enough people who think that something as odious as this ought not be in our foundation document, even if they don't like the idea of guys marrying guys. But the argument is much larger than the proposed amendment, and the marriage bigots are falsely arrogating the moral high ground in the argument.
I don't know how much more simple it can be made.Leave Application for Eid ul Adha Leave Application for Eid Celebration with Family. The Manager, Admin Department, Palmer and Harvey, U.K. Dear Sir, It is requested that I, Maria need six days leave from office for Eid Celebration with my family members in my home country.
UPDATE: May 28, As of May , marriage registration for foreign citizens within 24 hours program is supported, but can't be performed on the same day because of the background check required to approve the application.
How to prep for an online Australian Partner Visa Application. What to expect, what you learn after paying, & why no good Australian Partner Visa checklist exists. Welcome to our Signs of a Cheating Spouse Forum. There are countless signs of cheating husbands and wives that are left behind, that you may pick up on if you are paying attention.
Men are almost, always peddled as cheaters and liars. Thankfully many women know that’s a blanket statement and not true–in most cases. And in the cases that it proves true, you can bet that there is an equal share of gals who have succumbed to the same temptations.
Inthissection,listalltypesofincome(moneyreceived)and theamountsreceived bythepeopleyoulistedinSectionB.